|
|
|||
THIS WEEK at HILTON POND
22-31 November 2004
Installment #248---Visitor #
(Back to Preceding Week; on to Next Week
|
Join Us for the |
|
|
IMITATING NATURE Although we Homo sapiens often pride ourselves on creativity, many of our creations were "thought of" by nature long before anyone filed patent for some supposedly innovative idea. Bats and Bottle-nosed Dolphins were using navigational sonar eons before the U.S. Navy put it in a submarine, while hooks on hitch-hiking cockleburs from Common Burdock preceded the concept of Velcro by hundreds of thousands of years. Nesting wasps that chew up wood to make paper likely inspired people to do something similar, and even the mist nets we use at Hilton Pond Center to catch birds are paltry imitation of a spider's well-woven bug-snaring web. Indeed, nature was 'way ahead of us on lots of "innovations," which brings us to an interesting outdoor detective story that involves Eastern Red Cedars, Juniperus virginiana.
All text & photos © Hilton Pond Center In 1982 when we first moved to Hilton Pond Center, the site had been in row crops and graze for perhaps a century. Over the past 23 years, we've let nature take its course and vegetational succession has converted the 11 acres from grassy old field to mixed woodland. About ten years ago, portions of the property were so densely covered by 12-foot Eastern Red Cedars it was impossible to see more than a yard or two through their dense, green branches. Mingled among the cedars were sapling Winged Elms and Sweetgums--fast-growing hardwoods that eventually shot to the canopy and cast shade. Eastern Red Cedars don't care for shady situations--they do best in open areas where they acquire conical Christmas tree shapes--so they still tried to reach for the sun. As the slower-growing cedars began losing the battle of succession, their light-starved bottom branches dropped all needles--making the woods more open at eye-level. Although healthy Eastern Red Cedars have dark, reddish-brown bark (right), good numbers of the lifeless nevergreens have no bark at all, and the bright tan of their underlying wood stands out starkly amongst the winter drab. These particular trees have been stripped of every vestige of their stringy bark, raising the question of what did the stripping. We enjoy using the Socratic Method to help our visitors solve this "Mystery of the De-barked Cedars," but sometimes it takes a while for the whole story to unfold. When we ask visiting groups how the dead cedars might have lost their bark, the usual answers are "birds" or "the wind" or "some kind of insect." Although some stringy bark might have been removed by nest-building birds, the prevalence of naked cedars in the woods rules out avifauna as the main perpetrators, and insects and wind couldn't have done it all either. Eventually someone says "Squirrels must have done it," after which we ask "What kind?" In turn, the visitor usually specifies "gray squirrel." Indeed, we have observed Eastern Gray Squirrels gathering cedar bark, but our visitors to Hilton Pond haven't, and since it's impossible to get a group into the top of a towering oak we can't show them contents of a tree squirrels' nest. Thus, we ask if another squirrel might have gathered the bark. At some point the group's eyes light up as one of them happily sings out "flying squirrel!" Now THAT'S a squirrel we can deal with because Southern Flying Squirrels, Glaucomys volans, don't nest in the highest treetops and often occupy human-made bluebird boxes down low where we can see them. Since Hilton Pond Center happens to have a bunch of nestboxes--no longer occupied by bluebirds now that the woods have matured--we lead the group to a nearby pole where an old box still hangs. If the box is active, the visitors are soon treated to the rare sight of a flying squirrel popping out of the box, running up the pole, and then gliding off to a nearby tree--a behavior more likely to occur at night than in broad daylight. When everyone is finished oohing and aahing over the squirrel's aerobatic antics, we return to the Socratic discussion at hand, which now leads to "So why do you think a flying squirrel might gather red cedar bark and stuff it in its nestbox?" The groups's logical conclusion is that cedar bark provides insulation and helps keep a flying squirrel warm, but in our judgment this isn't the main function--especially since the woods provide plenty of other soft, fluffy plant material the squirrel might choose from. That's when we pose yet another question that requires our visitors to think a little about human history: "When the first settlers came over from Europe, what were their most valued possessions?" This time the answers range from "guns" to "tools" to "livestock" to "vegetable seeds they could plant" in the New World. We agree all these were important but that none would matter if settlers didn't make it through their long, cold first winter. This idea leads our visitors to conclude that cold-weather clothing would also be a very important commodity and that woolen garments might save the day if temperatures dropped really low. And that, as Paul Harvey says, is "the rest of the story." As they sailed over from Europe, early settlers most certainly would have brought their woolen undies--potentially life-saving clothing they were careful to protect from the ravages of wool-eating caterpillars. We doubt our flying squirrels at Hilton Pond Center comprehend the bug-busting value of red cedar bark in their nests. Those that gather it, however, likely have fewer nest parasites and pass on their cedar-seeking genes through higher numbers of surviving offspring. Early settlers in North America likewise survived in part by having warm clothes, but all they did by storing woolens in cedar boxes was imitate what flying squirrels did first. To be fair and honest, the original patent and all future royalties for the "bug-free" cedar chest should go to Mother Nature, the real "mother of invention."
All text & photos © Hilton Pond Center
Comments or questions about this week's installment? NOTE: Be sure to scroll down for an account of all birds banded or recaptured during the week, as well as some other interesting nature notes. "This Week at Hilton Pond" is written & photographed You may wish to consult our Index of all nature topics covered since February 2000. You can also use the on-line Search Engine at the bottom of this page. For a free, non-fattening, on-line subscription to "This Week at Hilton Pond," just send us an E-mail with SUBSCRIBE in the Subject line. Please be sure to configure your spam filter to accept E-mails from hiltonpond.org.
|
|
Make direct donations on-line through
Network for Good: |
|
|
LIKE TO SHOP ON-LINE?
Donate a portion of your purchase price from 500+ top on-line stores via iGive: |
|
|
Use your PayPal account
to make direct donations: |
|
|
|
|
SPECIES BANDED THIS WEEK: * = New species for 2004 WEEKLY BANDING TOTAL YEARLY BANDING TOTAL (2004) BANDING GRAND TOTAL All text & photos © Hilton Pond Center
|
NOTABLE RECAPTURES THIS WEEK
American Goldfinch (1) White-throated Sparrow (1) OTHER SIGHTINGS OF INTEREST --After the lengthy drought in the late 1990s and early 2000s Hilton Pond shows no signs of losing water. Another 2" of rain this week kept it full to the brim--much to the delight of a Belted Kingfisher that comes in to feed most afternoons. VAGRANT HUMMINGBIRDS
|
(Back to Preceding Week; on to Next Week)
You can alsopost questions for The Piedmont Naturalist |
Join the |
Search Engine for |
|
Up to Top of Page Back to This Week at Hilton Pond Center Current Weather Conditions at Hilton Pond Center |
|
|